BUYER'S GUIDE
Best Construction & Development Software for Commercial Real Estate (2026)
Updated February 2026 · 13 min read
TL;DR
Procore is the dominant player in construction management and works well for most CRE projects. OpenSpace handles site documentation with 360° capture. TestFit speeds up feasibility studies 30x. For pre-development, OpenCounter streamlines permitting where it's available. Saltmine owns workplace design. Pick based on which phase of development you need the most help with.
Construction is where the money is really at risk in CRE. A 5% cost overrun on a $50M project is $2.5M gone, and most overruns start with poor visibility into what's happening on the ground. The software in this category exists to prevent exactly that: giving developers, GCs, and owners real-time insight into budgets, schedules, and progress.
We went through 70+ tools tagged as construction and development software. Many of them are tangentially related at best. The ones that matter fall into a few buckets: construction management (Procore dominates), site documentation (OpenSpace), feasibility and planning (TestFit), and pre-development (permitting, zoning). Here are the standouts.
Quick Comparison
| Product | Best For | Starting Price | Free Trial |
|---|---|---|---|
| Procore | Construction management (all phases) | Custom (volume-based) | Yes |
| OpenSpace | Site documentation / progress tracking | Contact for pricing | No |
| TestFit | Site feasibility / building configurator | Contact for pricing | No |
| Saltmine | Workplace design / space programming | Contact for pricing | No |
| OpenCounter | Permitting / entitlements | Municipal contract | N/A |
| Dealpath | Development deal pipeline | Contact for pricing | No |
The 6 Best Construction & Development Platforms for CRE
1. Procore
Best for: Full construction management across all project phases
Procore is the market leader, and for good reason. Over 3 million projects in 150+ countries run on it. The unlimited users model is a genuine advantage because it means you can give everyone access (owners, GCs, subs, architects) without worrying about per-seat costs. The mobile app is one of the best in construction tech, which matters when your team spends most of their time on site, not at a desk.
The downside is cost. Procore prices based on your annual construction volume, which means it can get expensive for large developers. It's also primarily a construction-phase tool. If you need pre-development feasibility or post-construction asset management, you'll need additional software. But for managing the actual build, from pre-con through closeout, Procore is hard to beat.
What's good
- Industry-leading platform with 3M+ projects globally
- Unlimited users model encourages broad adoption
- Excellent mobile app for field teams
- Strong ecosystem of integrations and add-ons
What's not
- Volume-based pricing can be expensive for large developers
- Construction-focused, not a full CRE lifecycle tool
- Can be overkill for small renovations or TI projects
- Annual contracts with limited flexibility
Pricing: Custom pricing based on annual construction volume. Typically $10,000-50,000+/year. Free trial available.
2. OpenSpace
Best for: Construction site documentation and progress tracking
OpenSpace captures construction sites in 360° and maps the images to your floor plans using AI. You walk the site with a 360° camera (or phone, or drone), and OpenSpace stitches everything together so you can virtually revisit any spot on the jobsite from any date. 60+ billion square feet captured across 129 countries. That scale is real.
The value is in dispute resolution and progress tracking. When there's a disagreement about what was installed behind a wall, you have photographic evidence. When you need to verify progress for a draw request, you can check remotely. The trade-off is that you need to commit to regular captures (weekly walks) and invest in 360° camera hardware. If your team does it consistently, the documentation pays for itself in avoided disputes.
What's good
- 60B+ sq ft captured across 129 countries
- Works with 360° cameras, phones, drones, and scanners
- AI auto-mapping eliminates manual photo organization
- Time-lapse and progress comparison features
What's not
- Enterprise pricing not publicly available
- Requires consistent capture routine to be valuable
- 360° camera hardware adds upfront cost
- Value diminishes if captures aren't done regularly
Pricing: Quote-based. Contact OpenSpace for pricing.
3. TestFit
Best for: Site feasibility and rapid building configuration
TestFit does something that used to take architects weeks: it generates building configurations on a site and tells you whether a deal makes financial sense. You input the site, constraints, and target program, and it produces feasibility studies 30x faster than traditional methods. It also generates 2-3x more design iterations for the same budget, which means you're more likely to find the optimal configuration.
The automatic cost takeoffs reduce estimation errors, and exports to Revit mean the work flows into your design process. TestFit is focused on the feasibility stage, though, not full architectural design. If a deal passes the TestFit test, you still need architects for the real design work. But killing bad deals faster is extremely valuable, and that's where TestFit shines.
What's good
- 30x faster feasibility modeling
- 2-3x more design iterations for the same budget
- Automatic cost takeoffs reduce estimation errors
- Direct export to Revit for design continuity
What's not
- Pricing not publicly listed
- Focused on feasibility, not full architectural design
- Learning curve for maximizing AI optimization
- Requires sales consultation to get started
Pricing: Subscription-based. Contact for pricing.
4. Saltmine
Best for: Workplace design and space programming
Saltmine takes the pain out of space programming, which is one of the slowest parts of workplace design. They claim 70-90% faster programming, which translates to cutting weeks off the pre-design phase. The platform also reports 5-10% reduction in change orders and 3-5% smarter space use, both of which translate directly to cost savings on a large project.
The unlimited scenario testing is the real selling point. You can model different layouts, headcount projections, and work styles without starting from scratch each time. The 4-8 week implementation timeline is reasonable for enterprise software. The main limitation is that Saltmine is focused on workplace/office design, not all property types. If you're developing multifamily or industrial, this isn't your tool.
What's good
- 70-90% faster space programming
- 5-10% reduction in change orders
- Unlimited scenario testing for design iteration
- Integrates with CAD and BIM workflows
What's not
- Enterprise pricing not publicly available
- 4-8 week implementation timeline
- Focused on workplace/office, not all property types
- Requires quality data inputs for optimal results
Pricing: Quote-based. Contact Saltmine for pricing.
5. OpenCounter
Best for: Permitting and entitlements in participating cities
OpenCounter is a different kind of tool. It doesn't sell to developers directly; it sells to municipalities. But if you're developing in a city that uses OpenCounter, it dramatically reduces the time and frustration of the permitting process. Transparent zoning information, clear fee structures, and streamlined applications instead of playing phone tag with the planning department.
Deployed in 40+ US cities, which means coverage is limited. You can't subscribe as a developer; you benefit from it when your target market happens to use it. That limitation aside, where it's available, OpenCounter makes pre-development research significantly faster. Check if your markets have it before writing it off.
What's good
- Dramatically reduces permitting processing times
- Transparent zoning and fee information
- Self-service for developers, no waiting on staff
- Deployed in 40+ US cities
What's not
- Only available where municipalities have adopted it
- Developers can't subscribe directly
- Coverage limited to participating cities
- No control over when your market might adopt it
Pricing: Municipal contract model. Free for developers in participating cities.
6. Dealpath
Best for: Managing the development deal pipeline from acquisition to delivery
Dealpath shows up in the construction and development category because development firms use it to manage the deal pipeline from land acquisition through project delivery. It tracks every deal from intake through screening, underwriting, approvals, and execution. The AI can pull data from offering materials automatically, which speeds up the screening process significantly.
It's not a construction management tool (use Procore for that). It's the system that tells you which developments to pursue, tracks where each project stands in the pipeline, and gives leadership visibility across the portfolio. The 5-user minimum and 6-8 week implementation mean it's for established development firms, not small shops.
What's good
- Purpose-built for CRE deal and development pipelines
- AI data ingestion from OMs and deal materials
- Portfolio-level visibility for leadership
- White-glove implementation support
What's not
- 5-user minimum excludes small teams
- Not a construction management tool
- 6-8 week implementation
- Quote-based pricing
Pricing: Subscription with multiple tiers. 5-user minimum. Contact for pricing.
How We Evaluated These Tools
Construction and development software needs to solve real problems on real projects. Here's what we looked at:
- Which phase does it cover? Pre-development, construction, and post-construction are different problems. We identified where each tool fits in the development lifecycle.
- Does it work in the field? Construction happens on jobsites, not in conference rooms. Mobile experience and offline capability matter.
- Can all stakeholders use it? Development projects involve owners, GCs, subs, architects, and lenders. The tool needs to work for all of them.
- What's the ROI case? We looked for tools that demonstrably reduce cost overruns, schedule delays, or administrative overhead.
- How long to implement? Some tools are up in a day. Others take months. We noted the ramp-up time for each.
Frequently Asked Questions
What's the difference between construction management and development software?
Construction management software (like Procore) focuses on the build phase: budgets, schedules, field documentation, and subcontractor management. Development software is broader, covering feasibility analysis, entitlements, financing, and project delivery from land acquisition through lease-up. Most developers use both.
Is Procore worth the cost for CRE developers?
For projects over $5M, almost certainly. The unlimited users model means your entire team, subs, and consultants can access it, which improves communication and reduces disputes. For small TI projects or renovations under $1M, Procore is probably overkill, and a simpler project management tool would suffice.
How much does construction management software cost?
Procore prices based on construction volume (typically $10,000-50,000+/year). Smaller tools start at $50-300/month. Specialty tools like TestFit and OpenSpace are quote-based. Development pipeline tools like Dealpath are also quote-based with per-user pricing. Budget $500-2,000/month for a mid-size development firm's software stack.
Do I need separate tools for pre-development and construction?
Usually, yes. No single platform handles feasibility analysis, permitting, construction management, and post-construction operations equally well. The typical stack for a developer includes a feasibility tool (TestFit), a construction management platform (Procore), and a deal/portfolio management system (Dealpath). Some firms add site documentation (OpenSpace) on top.
Browse All Construction & Development Software
See the full list of 70+ construction and development tools in our directory.
View All Construction & Development Tools →