HqO vs Equiem: Which Is Better in 2026?
Updated October 4, 2026. Independent editorial; how we research.
HqO is the broader platform reaching into operations, leasing and portfolio intelligence; Equiem is the tenant engagement and flex space specialist with a strong international footprint.
| HqO | Equiem | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Pricing model | — | Quote-based |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Best for | Property Managers, Asset Managers, Leasing Teams | Asset Managers, Property Managers, Workplace Managers |
| Company size | Mid-Market, Enterprise | Mid-Market, Enterprise |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud, Mobile |
| Primary category | Tenant Experience | Tenant Experience |
Our Verdict
HqO and Equiem started in the same place, a branded app that gives office tenants access to building services, events and amenities, and both have since grown into wider platforms for landlords. HqO, based in Boston, now describes itself as a real estate experience platform and a CRM built for commercial real estate. Equiem sells Equiem One, a modular system, and reports deployments in more than 800 buildings covering 145 million square feet across 25 countries, with over 300,000 registered users.
HqO wins on breadth. Its REX platform is organized into six suites: Intelligence for portfolio analytics, Experience for engagement and amenity management, Tenant as the app-based front door, Operations as a cloud building management system, Leasing for visibility into the leasing process, and Vendor for service providers. For an owner that wants tenant data to inform leasing and asset management decisions, that is a wider remit than a tenant app. The caveats: pricing is quote-based, the scope means a heavier rollout, and an owner that only wants an amenity booking app may be buying more than it needs.
Equiem wins on focus and on international reach. Its modules are easy to map to a need: Engage for community and events, Ops for property management automation, Flex for running and monetizing flexible space, Data for analytics, Connect for integrations and APIs, and Hybrid for hybrid work tools. It reports average monthly active use of 44% and markets itself to business parks, science parks and mixed-use estates as well as prime offices. The caveats: pricing is not published, the product is oriented to office and mixed-use rather than other asset classes, and like any tenant app its value depends on tenants actually adopting it.
Choose HqO if you want a single platform that ties tenant experience to operations, leasing and portfolio-level intelligence, and you have the team to roll it out. Choose Equiem if your priority is tenant engagement, flexible space revenue and building operations across an office or campus portfolio, particularly outside the United States. In either case, ask for adoption figures from buildings similar to yours, because engagement is what determines the return.
HqO
Equiem
Frequently Asked Questions
Do HqO or Equiem publish pricing?
No. Both are sold by quote, typically priced by portfolio size and the modules selected.
Which is better for managing flexible space?
Equiem has a dedicated Flex module for managing and generating revenue from flexible space. HqO covers amenity and space booking within its Experience and Tenant suites.
Are these tools only for office buildings?
Mostly. Both are designed around commercial office tenants. Equiem also markets to business parks, science parks and mixed-use developments. Residential operators typically use separate resident experience tools.
Is HqO a tenant app or a CRM?
Both. HqO still provides a tenant-facing app, but it now positions the wider platform as a CRM for commercial real estate that also covers operations, leasing and portfolio intelligence.
Also consider in Tenant Experience
FRONTSTEPS
Livly
ManageCasa
