Reonomy's ownership intelligence, piercing LLCs and trusts and tracking debt maturity, makes it a favorite prospecting tool, but the data flags real limitations. Pricing is not publicly available, data accuracy varies by market and is strongest in major metros, the research operation is smaller than CoStar's with some coverage gaps, and commercial lease data is limited compared to CoStar or CompStak. If your work leans on lease comps or secondary-market coverage, those gaps matter.
Choosing a replacement depends on which Reonomy job you are hiring for. Pure prospecting and owner lookup can be had much cheaper. Lease and transaction comps need a comps-first platform. Institutional teams stitching multiple data sources together may want a data-integration layer rather than another standalone database. And map-driven parcel research is its own category. Test any alternative in your actual markets first, since coverage variability is the common weakness across property data tools.
Comprehensive real estate data and analytics for CRE research.
Why pick it over Reonomy: The budget-friendly swap for prospecting: $60/month with a free trial, owner lookup, list building, and foreclosure tracking, versus Reonomy's undisclosed pricing. Its depth is best in NYC and major metros, so check your market.
The leading commercial real estate information, analytics, and online marketplace platform.
Why pick it over Reonomy: Solves Reonomy's coverage and lease-data gaps in one move: the most comprehensive CRE database, maintained by a 1,000+ person research team. The trade is premium pricing, annual contracts, and a steep learning curve.
Commercial real estate software platform.
Why pick it over Reonomy: Directly fills Reonomy's weakest area, lease data: crowdsourced comps with granular effective-rent detail from 35,000+ contributing members, free for brokers and appraisers who contribute. It is comps-focused rather than an ownership-intelligence tool.
Commercial real estate software platform.
Why pick it over Reonomy: For institutional teams, Cherre connects 150+ data partnerships into a universal data model instead of one vendor's records, purpose-built for institutional investors. Enterprise-only pricing and real implementation work make it a bigger commitment than Reonomy.
Comprehensive location mapping software; analysis; & management for CRE. Source new deals; rule in & out parcels; do market & owner research.
Why pick it over Reonomy: A map-first alternative for parcel research and deal sourcing with nationwide coverage, LightBox's cross-dataset property linking, and in-platform zoning data. Pricing is quote-based and the feature set is enterprise-oriented.
Property information and analytics.
Why pick it over Reonomy: Brings 98%+ property coverage in major markets, 30 years of historical data, and climate risk analytics that Reonomy does not offer. It serves many industries beyond CRE, and the product suite can overwhelm smaller organizations.
Owner info; parcel boundaries. Basic research.
Why pick it over Reonomy: The lightweight, cheap option: parcel boundaries and owner info from $9.99/month with a free plan, trusted by 40,000+ professionals. It is best for rural and land work and far shallower than Reonomy for commercial ownership research.
There is no free tool that replicates Reonomy's LLC-piercing ownership intelligence. Land id offers a free plan for basic parcel and owner lookups, though it is limited and geared to rural and land work. Reonomy itself offers a free trial, which is worth using to benchmark any alternative. For most professionals, the realistic budget option is paid but cheap: PropertyShark at $60/month.
Yes. Reonomy does not publish pricing, but PropertyShark starts at a transparent $60/month with a free trial and covers owner lookup, list building, and distressed-property tracking, strongest in NYC and major metros. Land id runs $9.99-$19.99/month for basic parcel and ownership research. Neither matches Reonomy's debt-maturity data or AI-connected ownership profiles, which remain its differentiators.