Reonomy vs PropertyShark: Which Is Better in 2026?
Updated October 4, 2026. Independent editorial; how we research.
Reonomy is the nationwide commercial prospecting database; PropertyShark is the lower-cost property research tool with its deepest records in New York and other major metros.
| Reonomy | PropertyShark | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $400/month (annual subscription) | $60/month |
| Pricing model | Subscription | Subscription |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes |
| Best for | Commercial Real Estate Professionals, Property Researchers, Investment Analysts | Investor, Broker, Developer |
| Company size | Small, Mid-Market, Enterprise | Small, Mid-Market, Enterprise |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Primary category | Data & Analytics | Data & Analytics |
Our Verdict
Reonomy and PropertyShark both answer the question "who owns this property and what is the history?", and both are owned by larger groups: Reonomy is an Altus Group business and PropertyShark belongs to Yardi. They differ in coverage, in what they are designed for, and in price point.
Reonomy wins for commercial prospecting at national scale. It covers more than 53 million properties and 54 million commercial parcels across all 50 states, and connects ownership, sales history, debt and lien records, refinance activity and occupant data into one searchable profile. Its tools for seeing through LLCs to the people behind them, and its likelihood-to-sell scoring, are built for brokers, lenders and service providers building call lists. Reonomy publishes a starting price of $400 a month on an annual subscription, with a month-to-month option at a higher rate, 1,000 exports a month included, and separate quotes for bulk data feeds and API access. The caveats: that entry price is high for an individual, data quality varies by county because it rests on public records, and it is not a source of verified lease comps.
PropertyShark wins for property-level research in the markets it covers best. It provides ownership, sales, liens, permits, zoning, violations, foreclosure data and property reports for both commercial and residential property, and is especially well regarded in New York City. It is sold as self-serve monthly or annual subscriptions with a set number of property reports each month, at a much lower entry point than Reonomy. The caveats: depth varies widely by market, the interface is older in style, and it is weaker as a nationwide list-building tool.
The practical test is geography and volume. Run a handful of addresses you know well through each trial and compare what comes back, particularly the owner contact details.
Choose Reonomy if you prospect commercial owners across multiple states, need exports for outreach at volume, or want data delivered by feed or API. Choose PropertyShark if you work mainly in New York or another well-covered metro, need detailed reports on individual properties including residential, and want a lower monthly commitment.
Reonomy
PropertyShark
Frequently Asked Questions
How much does Reonomy cost?
Reonomy states that plans start at $400 a month on an annual subscription, and that annual billing saves 30% against paying monthly. Bulk data feeds and API connections are quoted by sales.
Is PropertyShark only for New York?
No, it covers major markets across the United States, but its records are deepest in New York City, where it started. Check coverage for your own market during a trial before subscribing.
Which is better for finding property owner contact details?
Reonomy is built around this, linking LLCs to the individuals behind them across all 50 states. PropertyShark also offers owner information, with its fullest ownership detail on higher plans and in its strongest markets.
Do either include lease comps?
Not in the way CoStar or CompStak do. Both focus on ownership, sales, debt and property records rather than verified lease transaction data.
Also consider in Data & Analytics
Kalibrate
Kato
LandGate
