Archibus vs Planon: Which Is Better in 2026?
Updated September 2, 2026. Independent editorial; how we research.
Archibus, now under Eptura, fits US enterprises and government with deep CAD-linked space management; Planon fits global occupiers wanting a configurable IWMS with lease accounting and sustainability.
| Archibus | Planon | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Pricing model | Quote-based | Enterprise |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Best for | — | Facility Manager, Workplace Manager, Real Estate Director |
| Company size | — | Enterprise |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud, On-Premise |
| Primary category | Workplace & Space Management | Workplace & Space Management |
Our Verdict
Archibus and Planon are two of the longest-running integrated workplace management systems (IWMS). Both cover space planning, asset and maintenance management, real estate portfolio tracking, and workplace services for large occupiers. Archibus is now part of Eptura, which folded it into a broader worktech stack alongside iOFFICE and SpaceIQ, and it is delivered as a cloud product. Planon remains an independent European vendor offering both cloud and on-premise deployment, with a strong footprint among universities, corporates, and service providers in EMEA.
Archibus wins for US-based enterprises and public sector bodies. It holds FedRAMP authorization, which matters for federal agencies and contractors, and its Autodesk integration makes it a natural fit for organizations that manage floor plans in AutoCAD or Revit. Eptura's platform adds employee-facing tools such as desk and room booking, Microsoft Teams and Slack hooks, and AI-assisted reservations. The honest caveats: the Eptura rebrand has created some confusion about product naming and roadmaps, pricing is quote-based, and the platform is more than a mid-sized company with simple needs will use.
Planon wins for organizations that want a single configurable system across real estate, facilities, and services, particularly with global or European operations. Its scope includes lease accounting, sustainability and energy tracking, field service management, and smart building integrations, with connectors for SAP, Microsoft 365, and ServiceNow. Analyst firms including Verdantix, Gartner, and IDC have rated it a leader. The trade-offs are enterprise-only pricing, implementations that usually require specialist consultants, and a thinner US presence than Archibus.
Pick Archibus if you are US-centric, need FedRAMP, or live in Autodesk drawings. Pick Planon if you need on-premise deployment, lease accounting, or a global rollout with heavy configuration. Either way, budget for a multi-month implementation and get quotes, because neither vendor publishes pricing.
Archibus
Planon
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Archibus still a standalone product?
Archibus is now sold by Eptura, which combined it with iOFFICE and SpaceIQ into one worktech platform. It remains the IWMS suite within that platform for complex real estate and facilities environments.
Does Planon offer on-premise deployment?
Yes. Planon is available as cloud or on-premise software, while Archibus under Eptura is delivered as a cloud service.
How much do Archibus and Planon cost?
Neither vendor publishes pricing. Both are enterprise products sold on quote, typically with annual contracts and separate implementation fees.
Which is better for a US government agency, Archibus or Planon?
Archibus. It holds FedRAMP authorization, which US federal agencies generally require for cloud software, and it has a larger US presence than Planon, which is primarily EMEA-focused.